首页> 外文OA文献 >Memory for Spatial Locations in a Patient with Near Space Neglect and Optic Ataxia: Involvement of the Occipitotemporal Stream
【2h】

Memory for Spatial Locations in a Patient with Near Space Neglect and Optic Ataxia: Involvement of the Occipitotemporal Stream

机译:近空间忽视和视神经共振患者的空间位置记忆:Occipitotemporal流的参与

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous studies suggested that the occipitoparietal stream orients attention toward the near/lower space and is involved in immediate reaching, whereas the occipitotemporal stream orients attention toward the far/upper space and is involved in delayed reaching. In the present study, we investigated the role of the occipitotemporal stream in attention orienting and delayed reaching in a patient (GP) with bilateral damage to the occipitoparietal areas and optic ataxia. GP and healthy controls took part in three experiments. In the experiment 1, the participants bisected lines oriented along radial, vertical, and horizontal axes. GP bisected radial lines farther, and vertical lines more above, than the controls, consistent with an attentional bias toward the far/upper space and near/lower space neglect. The experiment 2 consisted of two tasks: (1) an immediate reaching task, in which GP reached target locations under visual control and (2) a delayed visual reaching task, in which GP and controls were asked to reach remembered target locations visually presented. We measured constant and variable distance and direction errors. In immediate reaching task, GP accurately reached target locations. In delayed reaching task, GP overshot remembered target locations, whereas the controls undershot them. Furthermore, variable errors were greater in GP than in the controls. In the experiment 3, GP and controls performed a delayed proprioceptive reaching task. Constant reaching errors did not differ between GP and the controls. However, variable direction errors were greater in GP than in the controls. We suggest that the occipitoparietal damage, and the relatively intact occipitotemporal region, produced in GP an attentional orienting bias toward the far/upper space (experiment 1). In turns, the attentional bias selectively shifted toward the far space remembered visual (experiment 2), but not proprioceptive (experiment 3), target locations. As a whole, these findings further support the hypothesis of an involvement of the occipitotemporal stream in delayed reaching. Furthermore, the observation that in both delayed reaching tasks the variable errors were greater in GP than in the controls suggested that in optic ataxia is present not only a visuo- but also a proprioceptivo-motor integration deficit.
机译:先前的研究表明,枕顶流将注意力引向近/下部空间并参与立即到达,而枕颞流将注意力引向远/上部空间并参与延迟到达。在本研究中,我们调查了枕颞流在注意力定向和延迟伸入患者(GP)中的作用,该患者对枕顶壁区和视神经共济失调有双侧损害。 GP和健康对照组参加了三个实验。在实验1中,参与者将沿径向,垂直和水平轴定向的线一分为二。 GP将径向线一分为二,比控制线更远的垂直线,这与注意偏向远处/上部空间和忽略近处/下部空间一致。实验2包含两个任务:(1)立即到达任务,其中GP在视觉控制下到达目标位置;(2)延迟视觉到达任务,其中GP和控件被要求到达以视觉方式呈现的记住的目标位置。我们测量了恒定和可变的距离和方向误差。在立即到达任务中,GP准确到达了目标位置。在延迟到达任务中,GP会记住目标位置,而控件会低于目标位置。此外,GP中的变量错误比对照组更大。在实验3中,GP和对照组执行了延迟的本体感受到达任务。 GP和控件之间的恒定到达误差没有差异。但是,GP中的可变方向误差比对照组大。我们建议枕骨顶叶损伤和相对完整的枕颞叶区域在GP中产生了朝远处/上方空间的注意力定向偏向(实验1)。反过来,注意力偏向选择性地移向了远处记住的视觉(实验2)而不是本体感受(实验3)目标位置。总体而言,这些发现进一步支持了枕颞流参与延迟到达的假说。此外,观察到在两个延迟到达任务中,GP的可变误差都比对照组大,这表明在视觉共济失调中不仅存在视觉上的而且还存在本体感受器-运动的整合不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号